🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it seems it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an event that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between international African diaspora communities, has developed a business-like atmosphere, expanding to include gatherings where individuals of African heritage are remunerated to address white audiences about implicit prejudice and “allyship”. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s generated a rise in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.

The Background of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in winter, but also in autumn in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has evolved since its inception, focusing less on the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and more on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with talks and cultural events. But the manner the observance is observed is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a instructive case in how appropriation leads to weakening: the restructuring of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to confront embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Jarring Moment

Hardly anything shows how crucial it is to reconsider Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the Britain, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform party is leading the polls. In the recent season we witnessed the largest far-right rally in the history of Britain. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a legislator feels emboldened to state that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are growing in the EU as a entirety.

In the United States, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, frequently with success, to the top legal institutions of the state. A drive to erase African American heritage and narrative from the records is under way. One of Donald Trump's early administrative commands targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to change the national past” by portraying America “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the month symbolises how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is limited to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized festivities of historical achievements, rather than challenging the situation of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its restricted time span means that it is separated from the broader ongoing work that is required. A university professor, a professor at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she raised concerns about the fleeting superficial actions of the observance. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month turns into a fleeting performance rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to alter, change and broaden efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a temptation to just discontinue events including Black History Month completely, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an era that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and legacy of campaigns for equality – local anti-racism groups, DEI programs, and yes, even those talks to businesses – constitute an infrastructure that a considerable labor has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the politics moves on (and in fact, declines), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed throughout the annual calendar (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) integrated into academic syllabi. It would also be a period that does not evade governmental matters, and provides room for people, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What value has basic knowledge of the bygone era when it ignores the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the street? Organizations who celebrate it should not be pacified with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and alertness to minor insults, but challenged by the risks that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not treated with importance. To summarize, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, pressing, and responsive. It could be that an total re-identification is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.